A questionnaire circulated by the Facebook group Solar in Buffalo Trace Area asked candidates across multiple races to clarify their positions on two critical land-use issues: utility-scale solar development and broader economic development strategy. The results, now published online, reveal a noticeable divide in responsiveness.

A Clear Participation Gap

According to the published data, a strong majority of Democratic candidates responded to the questionnaire, while less than half of Republican candidates did. A related summary circulating on social media reported:

• 86% of Democratic candidates responded

• 42% of Republican candidates responded

While not every race followed the same pattern, the overall trend suggests a significant gap in candidate engagement.

Who Responded—and Who Didn’t

The response chart spans several key races, including:

• Maysville City Commission

• Maysville Mayor

• Mason County Commissioner (Districts 1–3)

• Mason County Judge Executive

• Kentucky State Representative (District 70)

Some races show near-complete participation, while others reveal multiple candidates declining or failing to respond.

Maysville City Commission

• Responded: Brey Foster, Victor McKay, Rick Lawrence, Tommy Marshall, Steve Chandler, Kirby Bennett, Laron Washington

• Did not Respond: Ann Brammer, John Meng, David Irwin, David Cartmell, David Doyle

Maysville Mayor

• Responded: Debra Cotterill, Robert Boone

Mason County Commissioner District 1

• Responded: Rebecca Cartmell, Noah Kalb, Paula Cokonougher

• Did not Respond: Glenny Riggs Jr.

District 2

• Responded: Janet Garrison, Larry Fetters, Dwayne Sharp

• Did not Respond: Jason Sheppeck, Henry Boone

District 3

• Responded: William Lawrence

Mason County Judge Executive

• Responded: Owen McNeil

• Did not Respond: Max Moran, Peggy Frame, Eric Bach

Kentucky State Representative District 70

• Responded: Charlotte Harris, Travis Huber

• Did not Respond: Mike Fisher

This uneven participation cuts across both partisan and nonpartisan races, though the partisan breakdown remains notable.

Why It Matters

The questionnaire focuses on issues that are rapidly becoming central to Mason County’s future: land use, solar energy, and large-scale development projects.

These issues are not theoretical. The county is actively debating major proposals—including a potential hyperscale data center expected to reshape the local economy and landscape. Supporters point to job creation and economic growth, while critics raise concerns about farmland loss, environmental impact, and transparency in negotiations.

Solar development is part of that same broader conversation. Advocates argue it could bring long-term tax revenue, reduce agricultural runoff, and help stabilize the local economy.

Opponents, meanwhile, worry about land use changes, community impact, and long-term consequences for rural character.

Transparency as a Campaign Issue

Beyond policy positions, the response data is fueling a larger debate: Do voters have a right to know where candidates stand before Election Day?

Organizers behind the questionnaire argue that answering basic policy questions is part of democratic accountability. In their view, candidates who decline to respond are still communicating something—just not directly.

As one summary post put it, candidates who don’t engage may be “telling us something about how they view the voters they hope to represent.”

The Bottom Line

With early voting approaching, Mason County voters are facing more than a choice between candidates—they’re choosing between different levels of openness.

In a political environment shaped by high-stakes development decisions, the question is becoming just as important as the answers:

Who is willing to go on record—and who isn’t?

Want to read every candidate’s answer to the organizers questionnaire? View their website at solarformasoncounty.com

During a special meeting held Wednesday evening, April 22, 2026, at the Mason County Public Library, commissioners unanimously approved the plans with a key condition: the option to extend an existing berm along Germantown Road if deemed necessary to mitigate impacts.

The meeting concluded quickly, which surprised few attendees. Residents expressed disappointment over the limited discussion prior to the vote, arguing that more thorough deliberation was needed on potential long-term effects.

One resident, Max Moran, drew comparisons to experiences in northern Virginia, where rapid data center expansion led to later regrets and corrective measures due to insufficient early regulations. “In my opinion, the regulations that this body and the county court has done is really mirroring what’s happened in northern Virginia,” Moran stated.

He emphasized that ongoing legal action by residents is not intended to halt the project entirely, but rather to ensure adequate safeguards are in place. “Our lawsuit was never about saying no; it was about trying to do good regulations,” Moran added.

Even with the approval moving forward, community members are advocating for consideration of alternative sites and stronger protections that balance economic benefits with community interests. Moran noted that while the project could potentially fit in the area under proper oversight, the location and regulations must prioritize resident well-being.

Commissioners stressed during the meeting that the approved plans remain preliminary. Developers can make adjustments as long as they comply with existing and future regulations.

The proposal involves a large-scale data center development on land in Mason County near Maysville, part of broader efforts in the region to accommodate growing demand for such facilities, often tied to artificial intelligence and technology infrastructure needs. Earlier steps included rezoning considerations and public hearings that drew significant community input.

This development comes as data centers continue to proliferate across the United States, raising debates about economic growth, infrastructure strain, noise, visual impacts, and effects on nearby residential areas.

Residents plan to monitor the next stages closely as the project advances toward potential final approvals by the Mason County Fiscal Court.

Hosted by the Wild Bull and Maysville City Commission Candidate Brey Foster, the event marks the semi-official kickoff for the venue and is being promoted as more than just a political gathering—but a community-centered night of connection, entertainment, and vision for the city’s future. According to event listings, the free event begins at 6:00 p.m. and will feature live music, guest speakers, delicious food from Lil Jumbo, a fully stocked cash bar provided by DeSah’s, and local engagement opportunities.

What’s drawing particular attention, however, is the expected attendance of current and aspiring public officials. Robert Boone, who currently serves on the Maysville City Commission, is expected to be in attendance, signaling interest from sitting leadership in the event’s message and momentum.

Also expected to attend is Travis Huber, who is running for State Representative. His presence adds a broader regional political dimension, highlighting how local races in Maysville may intersect with wider state-level efforts.

The event is being framed as a launchpad for “fresh leadership, perspectives, and integrity,” with organizers emphasizing the importance of rebuilding and strengthening Maysville through community involvement and new ideas.

With over 70 people already showing interest online and attendance expected from both voters and political figures, the gathering could serve as an early indicator of shifting energy in local politics ahead of the 2026 election cycle.

Residents are encouraged to attend, meet candidates and officials face-to-face, and take part in shaping the next chapter of Maysville’s leadership.

For more information and to RSVP visit their site at: www.breyforcitycommission.com/events

The April 1, 2026, “Resident Notice Update” from DPD Property Management, LLC revises an earlier March 28 communication. It credits Mason County Judge Executive Owen McNeill for negotiating improved terms with the proposed developer. The notice states that the park is under contract for purchase, though a firm closing date has not yet been set.

Details of the Offer

According to the letter:

•  Each tenant present at the time of the property closing will receive $50,000, held in escrow until the sale closes.

•  Option A: If a resident moves their mobile home out of the park, the escrow agent will issue a check for $50,000 once removal is complete.

•  Option B: If the home cannot be moved (or the resident chooses to leave it), they can transfer clean title to DPD Property Management, LLC, and receive the $50,000 payment.

•  Option C: Residents will have 90 days from the closing date to vacate the park. The exact closing timeline remains unconfirmed, after which all tenants will receive further notification.

The notice directs questions to Dusty Porter at 859-640-2032 and promises ongoing updates on the sale.

Broader Context: The Data Center Project

The relocation stems from plans by an unnamed Fortune 50 company (widely reported as a major player in artificial intelligence) to develop a hyperscale data center complex spanning over 2,000 acres near Maysville. The project envisions multiple large buildings, significant power infrastructure, and has been promoted for bringing economic benefits, including hundreds of permanent jobs and thousands of construction positions.

Mason County officials, including Judge Executive McNeill, have supported data center-friendly zoning changes in recent months, citing the need for rural economic development. However, the project has sparked controversy:

•  Some local farmers have rejected multimillion-dollar offers (one family reportedly turned down $26 million) to preserve their land.

•  Residents and groups like “We Are Mason County” have raised concerns about noise, water usage, environmental impact, traffic, and the secretive nature of early negotiations (including non-disclosure agreements).

•  Public hearings have drawn strong opposition, with threats of legal action to block or modify the development.

Meadowland Village is home to approximately 28 households, many consisting of elderly or disabled residents who may face challenges finding affordable housing alternatives. Local news outlets have highlighted the human impact, with some tenants expressing frustration over the short 90-day vacate window and the disruption to their lives.

Community Reactions

The notice was shared on social media via a “YES Data center- Mason County…” group. Reactions in the broader community have been mixed—some view the $50,000 as helpful compensation, while others argue it falls short given the costs of moving a mobile home, finding new sites, and potential loss of community ties. Nearby landowners have also voiced concerns about the data center’s scale and effects on rural character.

As of early April 2026, the project remains in planning stages, with zoning and permitting processes ongoing. No final closing date for the mobile home park has been announced, and further updates from DPD Property Management or county officials are expected.

This situation reflects a broader national tension between the explosive growth of data centers and the concerns of rural communities facing land-use changes, displacement, and infrastructure strains. Residents of Meadowland Village are advised to review the notice carefully and consult with the provided contact for personalized guidance.

With this addition, Mason County is now home to seven sites on the trail — more than any other community outside of Lexington and Louisville. This distinction underscores the rich layer of African American history preserved right here in our river town and surrounding areas.

Honoring a Remarkable Life

The memorial honors Reverend Elisha W. Green (c. 1810s–1889), a man whose journey from enslavement to spiritual and community leadership left a lasting mark on Kentucky. Born into slavery in Bourbon County, Green grew up on the “Glen Alice” farm outside Maysville in Mason County. He later purchased his own freedom and that of part of his family, became a licensed Baptist preacher in 1845, and helped establish African American Baptist congregations in both Maysville and Paris.

Green believed strongly that freedmen needed to own land for true independence. He partnered with a white landowner to help found an African American community near Paris. He also stayed politically engaged, Until his death in 1889, he remained a dynamic force in the churches he helped build.

The memorial stands at the intersection of Maddox Alley and West Fourth Street in Maysville — the site of the original Bethel Baptist Church, which Green helped found and where he served as pastor for more than 30 years. The church burned in the 1970s, but the location now features a Kentucky Historical Marker (#1962) dedicated to Green as a religious leader. Plans for the full memorial include a life-sized statue of Green holding a Bible in one hand while reaching toward the Ohio River — a powerful symbol of freedom just across the water.

A True Grassroots Effort

This achievement is the result of dedicated local work spanning years. Credit goes especially to Norbert Gallenstein and Buddy Gallenstein, who helped revive and advance the project after noticing the memorial’s base was designed to support a statue. The late Jerry Gore first championed marking the historic church site. Bethel Baptist Church, the Mason County Fiscal Court, and many other community members and organizations rallied behind the effort, making it a genuine grassroots initiative.

In 2024, fundraising efforts advanced with sculptor Sam McKinney (known locally for the buffalo statues at Limestone Park and work on the Market Street Fountain) providing a bid for the statue. The project has now culminated in the site’s recognition on the statewide trail.

Mason County’s Prominent Place on the Trail

Mason County’s seven trail sites include the Elisha Green Memorial alongside other significant locations such as:

•  The Harriet Beecher Stowe Museum / Marshall Key House

•  The National Underground Railroad Museum

•  The Maysville Underground Railroad Tour

•  Sites in Mays Lick, including the Brigadier General Charles Young Birthplace Cabin and Rosenwald School

This concentration makes Mason County a standout destination for those following the trail, which now features more than 50 sites across Kentucky. Visitors can learn about everything from Underground Railroad routes and Civil War-era stories to churches, schools, and community leaders who shaped our shared history.

Governor Beshear’s office has highlighted the trail as a way to celebrate voices too often overlooked while boosting local tourism and education. The Elisha Green Memorial perfectly embodies that mission — turning a local story of perseverance into part of Kentucky’s broader narrative.

Visit and Reflect

The Elisha Green Memorial site is open to the public and offers a quiet, meaningful place to pause and reflect on Reverend Green’s legacy and the larger history of freedom, faith, and community in Mason County. Whether you’re a longtime resident or just passing through, it’s a powerful reminder of the remarkable individuals who called this area home.

As one local leader put it during the planning stages, “He deserves it and the community deserves it.”

Mason County can take pride in this grassroots success and in the way our small community continues to preserve and share authentic history. Stop by the memorial, explore the other trail sites, and discover why there’s so much to celebrate right here at home.

For more information on Kentucky’s African American Heritage Trail, visit kentuckytourism.com/aaht. Details about Reverend Elisha Green and the memorial can be found through local historical resources and the Kentucky Historical Society marker page.

The event drew notable attendees, including former President Bill Clinton and former University of Kentucky men’s basketball coach John Calipari. A Facebook post uploaded by Digital Creator Amy Dudley shows photos from the event picturing Clinton, engaged in conversation among the crowd, while Calipari stood nearby in a black jacket. An onlooker captured the moment outside the stone building, with floral arrangements and attendees filling the area.

Cardinal Timothy Dolan led the blessing of the gardens, highlighting the project’s significance for the community. Local reports described the event as celebratory, with officials and guests marking the milestone ahead of the grand opening.

The Gardens at St. Patrick’s is expected to become a new public green space and attraction in Maysville, offering gardens, pathways, and gathering areas tied to the historic St. Patrick’s site.

Clinton and Calipari’s presence added a touch of star power to the local event. Calipari, who coached the Wildcats for 15 seasons before moving on, remains a prominent figure in Kentucky sports. Clinton, the 42nd president, has deep ties to the region through his political career.

This ribbon-cutting represents another step in the development of The Gardens at St. Patrick’s, which organizers hope will boost tourism and provide a serene space for residents and visitors in the Maysville area.

This article is based on reports and social media posts from the event on April 1, 2026.

According to a report by Local 12 The group ‘We Are Mason County, Ky. Inc’., along with individual plaintiffs including Max Moran, Kelly Manning, Laura Moran, Delsia Bare, Debra S. Bray, Janet Garrison, Barbara Jefferson, Julie Burton, Timothy Grosser, Jill Deatley, and Jennifer Setty-Botkin, filed a Complaint, Appeal and Petition for Declaration of Rights with the Mason Circuit Court (Civil Division). The lawsuit names Mason County Fiscal Court, Judge Executive Owen McNeill, the Mason County Planning Commission, Planning and Zoning Administrator George K. Larger, III, AICP, and their members in their official capacities as defendants.

The plaintiffs argue that a recently adopted county ordinance regulating data centers conflicts with Mason County’s comprehensive plan. They contend that the current zoning ordinance makes no specific mention of data centers, and that approving such large-scale industrial development without proper planning is unlawful. The suit seeks to invalidate the ordinance or related zoning actions and force reconsideration of the project, potentially resulting in a smaller facility at an alternative location.

The Proposed Project

An undisclosed Fortune 100 AI company has reportedly submitted plans for a massive “hyperscale data center complex” spanning approximately 2,000–2,080 acres of former agricultural land. The project would require rezoning dozens of parcels currently zoned for farming. Local officials have described the prospective tenant as a major global technology firm with extensive data center operations worldwide.

The company has approached multiple landowners with aggressive purchase offers — reportedly up to 10 times the local market value of farmland (roughly $6,000 per acre). Some families received offers exceeding $26 million for portions of their property, with at least one cattle farmer turning down bids as high as $35,000 per acre. Several landowners, including members of the plaintiff group, have publicly rejected the deals, citing a desire to preserve generational farmland.

Community Concerns and Opposition

Opponents, organized under “We Are Mason County,” have raised multiple concerns about the project:

•  Loss of prime farmland in a county known for cattle and agricultural production.

•  Potential pollution, noise from generators and cooling systems, and increased traffic.

•  Strain on local energy infrastructure and higher electricity costs for residents.

•  Mismatch with the county’s rural character and long-term comprehensive planning goals.

The group maintains that “zoning without planning is illegal” and that the rushed ordinance does not adequately address these impacts or align with existing land-use policies that emphasize preserving agriculture and rural character.

Public hearings on the rezoning application were held earlier this week, drawing strong community debate. An attorney representing residents had previously signaled the intent to file suit if the project advanced.

County Actions to Date

In late February 2026, the Mason County Fiscal Court approved Ordinance 26-01, which establishes specific regulations for data centers, including setbacks, noise limits, and height restrictions. County officials have described the ordinance as a framework to permit data centers in appropriate industrial zones rather than ban them outright. A rezoning map amendment application for the 2,080-acre site was formally submitted, with further planning commission review ongoing.

Efforts to reach members of the Mason County Planning Commission or Fiscal Court for comment on the newly filed lawsuit were unsuccessful as of this afternoon.

Broader Context

The Mason County dispute reflects a growing national tension between the explosive demand for data centers to support artificial intelligence training and inference — which require enormous amounts of land, power, and water — and local communities wary of industrial transformation in rural areas.

As the lawsuit proceeds in Mason Circuit Court, it could determine whether the hyperscale project moves forward as proposed, gets scaled back, relocated, or faces significant delays. The case highlights how even multimillion-dollar incentives may not overcome deeply held attachments to farmland and small-town character in places like northern Kentucky.

The plaintiffs are represented by counsel, though specific attorneys were not named in the initial filing excerpt. The defendants have not yet publicly responded to the complaint.

This story is developing. Updates will follow as the court case progresses.

The matter came to light after a nurse contacted local media outlets, prompting outreach to additional hospital personnel. According to reporting by WKRC-TV Local 12 In total, six staff members — including nurses and technicians — expressed apprehension about current staffing configurations and their potential effects on patient safety during cardiac procedures.

According to the individuals interviewed by the outlet, optimal operation of two catheterization labs typically requires a team of six registered nurses and three radiology technicians. At present, they report that staffing often consists of only one radiology technician, one experienced nurse, and two nurses in training. As a consequence, the staff members indicate that the laboratory can function at full capacity for approximately 10 days per month. On remaining days, patients in need of urgent cardiac intervention may require transfer to tertiary care facilities in Cincinnati, Ohio, or Lexington, Kentucky.

One nurse reported that, during a recent weekend, four patients were transferred to external hospitals due to the unavailability of an on-call team.

In response, hospital officials have provided a formal statement disputing the characterization of the situation as involving serious shortages. A spokesperson noted that, over the preceding six months, Meadowview Regional Medical Center has onboarded more than 35 nurses and technicians, as part of a broader recruitment effort totaling over 80 new hires across the organization.

The hospital further explained that it has implemented an updated, flexible staffing model in the cardiac catheterization laboratory. This adjustment aligns the lab’s operations with practices in other departments, enabling personnel levels to fluctuate in accordance with patient volume. Strategies include modifying shift lengths or reassigning staff to support other areas of the facility as needed.

Regarding laboratory availability, the spokesperson confirmed coverage from Monday through Friday, resulting in more than 10 operational days within a typical month. With respect to the specific weekend referenced, the hospital stated it was aware of only one patient transfer necessitated by staffing considerations, rather than four.

Meadowview Regional Medical Center acknowledged the persistent nationwide shortage of nursing professionals, emphasizing that the facility is not exempt from these industry-wide pressures. Nevertheless, leadership maintained that proactive recruitment and operational adaptations position the hospital to continue delivering high-quality care to the community.

This development underscores ongoing challenges in rural and regional healthcare delivery, where balancing staffing resources with patient demand remains a priority. Residents of Maysville and the surrounding region rely on Meadowview Regional Medical Center for timely access to essential services, including emergency cardiac care.

As the dialogue between frontline staff and hospital administration continues, transparency and sustained recruitment efforts will be critical to maintaining public confidence in local healthcare services.

The Mason County Fiscal Court adopted Ordinance 26-01 in February 2026, regulating data centers in I-3 zones with 750-ft residential setbacks, 500-ft from sensitive uses, 50 dB(A) daytime noise caps, daytime-only construction, and more. A rezoning public hearing for the ~28 parcels is set for March 25–26, 2026, at Fields Auditorium — just weeks before the primary.

The data center dominates local discussions, here’s a list of every candidate’s position on the data center project we could compile.

County Judge/Executive: The Central Battleground

Republican Primary (top vote-getter advances; ballot order: Frame, Bach, Moran):

•  Peggy S. Frame (R) — Incumbent County Commissioner. Leans in favor, emphasizing regulated implementation. At the February ordinance adoption, she thanked contributors and stated the project is a “good opportunity as long as it’s done in the right way,” praising the balanced rules.

•  Eric Bach (R) — Stance unknown. No public statements or positions on the data center have surfaced in reports or filings.

•  S. Max Moran (R) — Leader of We Are Mason County opposition group. Strongly against. Moran has been a leading voice at meetings, rallies, and online, criticizing NDAs, farmland destruction, environmental/health impacts, and lack of transparency. He demands stricter rules or outright rejection and has organized “NO DATA CENTER” signage and community efforts.

Democratic Side:

•  Owen J. McNeill (D) — Incumbent (re-elected 2022). Strongly in favor. McNeill has signed NDAs for negotiations, championed the new ordinance as protective and forward-thinking, and highlighted jobs/opportunity to bridge rural-urban divides. He compares it to past industrial growth and notes Mason County’s leadership in data center policy statewide.

Other county-wide offices remain largely unopposed and show no prominent data center ties:

•  Property Valuation Administrator: Troy Cracraft (D) — running unopposed. No public statements or positions on the data center have surfaced in reports or filings.

•  County Attorney: Claire Estill McHugh (D) — running unopposed (assisted with ordinance drafting). No public statements or positions on the data center have surfaced in reports or filings.

•  County Clerk: Stephanie G. Schumacher (R) — running unopposed. No public statements or positions on the data center have surfaced in reports or filings.

•  Sheriff: Ryan Swolsky (R) — running unopposed. No public statements or positions on the data center have surfaced in reports or filings.

District magistrate races exist but lack public stances on the issue.

Maysville City Commission: Emerging Voices

The crowded commission race (more than 8 candidates; primary narrows to top 8) features divided opinions:

•  Steve Chandler — In favor. He has publicly announced support for the secretive hyperscale project, citing potential benefits.

• David Doyle — No public statements or positions on the data center have surfaced in reports or filings.

•  Brey Foster — Strongly against. A lifelong resident and Maysville Commission on Human Rights member, Foster launched a Change.org petition (“Say No to Data Centers in Maysville KY”) and emphasizes transparency, public input, rural heritage protection, and halting approvals for full community discussion. Her campaign stresses accountability amid the debate.

• Ann Brammer — No public statements or positions on the data center have surfaced in reports or filings.

• Laron Washington — No public statements or positions on the data center have surfaced in reports or filings.

• Rick Lawrence — No public statements or positions on the data center have surfaced in reports or filings.

• Tommy Marshall — No public statements or positions on the data center have surfaced in reports or filings.

• David Cartmell — No public statements or positions on the data center have surfaced in reports or filings.

• John Meng — No public statements or positions on the data center have surfaced in reports or filings.

• Victor McKay — No public statements or positions on the data center have surfaced in reports or filings.

• Kirby Bennett — No public statements or positions on the data center have surfaced in reports or filings.

• David Irwin — No public statements or positions on the data center have surfaced in reports or filings.

Voters face a pivotal choice: supporters prioritize jobs, investment, and rural revitalization; opponents fear permanent landscape changes, quality-of-life erosion, and unaddressed risks. With rezoning hearings imminent, the primary could sway long-term outcomes.

A request for comment on the proposed data center was sent via email to all candidates. Most have yet to respond.

For updates, visit the Mason County Clerk, City of Maysville Data Center Zoning Public Information Page, Early voting details coming soon. This issue may define Mason County’s future for decades.

Chandler’s statement comes amid a heated discussion in the community about a secretive, billion-dollar hyperscale data center proposal from an unnamed Fortune 100 company. The project, potentially spanning up to 2,000 acres near areas like Big Pond Pike, has prompted significant pushback from residents concerned about environmental effects, quality of life, farmland loss, and strain on local resources. Some landowners have rejected multimillion-dollar offers to sell their property, with one family turning down nearly $8 million to preserve generational farmland.

In his post, Chandler emphasized leveraging Mason County’s power generation (via East Kentucky Power Cooperative), water from the Ohio River, land, and workforce to meet national demand for data centers. He argued that the industry is shifting away from densely populated areas, positioning the county as an ideal fit. However, he included caveats: development must be “responsible,” with maximum value negotiated from local resources and all additional power generation and usage costs borne by the data center companies—not ratepayers.

To bolster his position, Chandler shared a list of suggested searches (involving AI assistance) for residents to explore topics like utility service differences between KU and EKP in Maysville, reasons for data center concentrations in places like Loudoun County, Virginia, complaint origins, utility protections against price hikes, GOP-backed guardrails, 2025 tax incentives, and existing data centers on local grids. Critics might see this as an attempt to preempt concerns by directing people toward potentially favorable information, while glossing over documented local anxieties.

The proposal has sparked packed public meetings, zoning amendments under review by the Mason County Joint Planning Commission and Fiscal Court, and calls for transparency. Residents have voiced worries about air quality, increased traffic, perpetual construction noise, discrepancies in promised job numbers (ranging from 50 to 400 permanent positions in various reports), and the risk of higher electric rates despite assurances. Proponents highlight potential tax revenue and jobs, but opponents argue the secrecy and scale could disrupt rural life without guaranteed long-term benefits.

Chandler’s unequivocal endorsement—posted as he campaigns for a seat on the city commission—may alienate voters wary of large-scale industrial development in a historically agricultural and small-town area. While he stresses safeguards, the post arrives as community divisions deepen, with some viewing the project as a boon and others as a threat to the region’s character and environment. As zoning decisions loom, Chandler’s stance positions him firmly on one side of a divisive local issue that shows no signs of easy resolution.

This includes partisan primaries for county positions (primarily Republican and Democratic) and a non-partisan primary for the Maysville City Commission, where more than eight candidates filed, necessitating a primary to narrow the field to the top eight for the general election.

County Judge/Executive Race (Republican Primary)

The top executive position in Mason County features a three-way Republican contest. Voters will see the candidates listed in this order on the ballot:

•  Peggy S. Frame (R)

•  Eric Bach (R)

•  S. Max Moran (R)

This race will determine the Republican nominee to advance to the general election, where they will face any Democratic challengers (such as Owen J. McNeill, who filed as a Democrat).

County Commissioner Races (Partisan Primaries)

District One

•  Republican Primary:

•  Paula Cokononougher (R)

•  Glenny Riggs, Jr. (R)

•  Democratic Primary:

•  Noah Kaleleb Kalb (D)

•  Rebeccca Cartmell (D)

District Two

•  Republican Primary:

•  Dwayne Sharp (R)

•  Jason C. Sheppeck (R)

•  Larry “Speedy” Fetter (R)

•  Democratic Primary:

•  Henry C. Boone (D)

•  Janet Hauke Garrison (D)

These races highlight strong competition in both parties for county commissioner seats, which handle key local governance and budgeting decisions.

Constable District Two (Republican Primary)

A smaller but important race for constable in District Two includes:

•  Joe Collins (R)

•  James Conley (R)

Maysville City Commission (Non-Partisan Primary)

The Maysville City Commission race has attracted a large field of 12 candidates, all running non-partisan. The primary will advance the top eight vote-getters to the November general election. The official ballot order is:

1.  David Irwin

2.  John T. Meng

3.  Rick Lawrence

4.  Kirby Bennett

5.  Tommy Marshallsall, Jr.

6.  Steve Chandler

7.  Ann Brammer

8.  David C. Doyle

9.  Victor C. McKay

10.  Brey Foster

11.  David Cartmell

12.  LaRon Washington

For the most up-to-date information, including any changes or additional details, consult the Mason County Clerk or official Kentucky election resources.

The incident supposedly stemmed from a heated discussion about social media posts that reportedly led to complaints from Palmer’s wife and the department chaplain. Conley filed a formal complaint alleging workplace violence, retaliation, unprofessional conduct, bullying, and the creation of an unsafe and hostile work environment.

According to the complaint, Palmer questioned Conley about the posts and became irate. When Conley attempted to leave the room, Palmer grabbed him by both vest straps near the shoulders, restraining him while yelling.

Conley, who was not wearing his own body camera, activated Palmer’s device during the altercation. The footage captures Palmer acknowledging the physical contact.

“I’m sorry I put my hands on you, but I’m sorry you’re not going to come at me that way either,” Palmer said in the recording.

Conley responded: “You’re not going to touch me. Get out of my way. We’re going to city hall. Let’s go.”

Palmer continued: “I apologize for putting hands on you… You want my job, Chris?”

“I don’t want your job,” Conley replied.

Conley had reportedly documented prior issues with Palmer and requested a thorough investigation into the incident as well as any broader patterns of misconduct.

In response, the city manager allegedly sent a letter stating that Palmer had chosen to retire, This marks the end of Palmer’s tenure with the Maysville Police Department, where he had served in various roles since 2002, rising through the ranks from patrol officer to chief.

The department and city have not yet released further details on leadership transition or any ongoing internal review.

In a post shared on their Facebook page, Harrison Harvesting revealed that they closed on the property last week. Renovations are already underway at the building, which previously housed an Fazoli’s chain restaurant.

The company plans to open their third location of Bourbon Barrel Beef in early April, bringing their signature locally raised, hormone-free, farm-fresh beef and pork to local residents.

“You asked and we listened!” the announcement read, highlighting community demand as a key factor in the expansion. Bourbon Barrel Beef emphasizes Kentucky Proud products, with beef sourced from local farms, processed in-house at their headquarters in Carlisle (Nicholas County), and sold fresh-cut daily. Their existing locations in Carlisle and Georgetown have built a loyal following for high-quality, transparent meat sourcing—offering everything from premium steaks and roasts to specialty cuts.

The transition marks the end of an era for the Fazoli’s location, as the building and restaurant owner chose to sell the entire property, leading to the Italian chain’s closure there.

This move comes amid Bourbon Barrel Beef’s steady growth. The brand, tied to Harrison Harvesting’s operations, recently broke ground on another site in Richmond, Kentucky, signaling strong demand for local, butcher-style retail in the region.

Stay tuned to Harrison Harvesting’s social media for renovation progress, opening details, and what menu items or specials might await when doors open in the spring.

Filings for the primary election on May 19, 2026, have closed, revealing a mix of incumbents and challengers vying for county and city positions. Notably, the Maysville City Commission race has drawn more than eight candidates, triggering a primary to narrow the field to the top eight for the November general election.

This list is based on recent public filings. Parties are noted where applicable (R for Republican, D for Democrat), though some offices like Maysville Mayor and City Commission appear to be non-partisan. Keep in mind that candidate lists can evolve, so check with the Mason County Clerk’s office for the latest official updates.

County Offices

Property Valuation Administrator

•  Troy Cracraft (D)

County Judge/Executive

•  S. Max Moran (R)

•  Peggy Frame (R)

•  Eric Bach (R)

•  Owen J. McNeill (D)

County Attorney

•  A. Claire Estill McHugh (D)

County Clerk

•  Stephanie G. Schumacher (R)

Sheriff

•  Ryan Swolsky (R)

Jailer

•  Lisa Kern Yeary (R)

Coroner

•  David E. Lawrence (R)

County Surveyor

•  R. David Hord (D)

County Commissioners

District One

•  Glenny Riggs, Jr. (R)

•  Paula Cokonougher (R)

•  Noah Kalb (D)

•  Rebecca Cartmell (D)

District Two

•  Dwayne Sharp (R)

•  Jason C. Sheppeck (R)

•  Larry “Speedy” Fetters (R)

•  Henry C. Boone (D)

•  Janet Hauke Garrison (D)

District Three

•  William Lawrence (R)

Constables

District One

•  Ben Breslin (R)

District Two

•  Joe Collins (R)

•  James Conley (R)

District Three

•  Phil Day (D)

Maysville City Offices

Maysville Mayor

•  Debra L. Cotterill

•  Robert Boone

Maysville City Commission (Top 8 advance from primary)

•  Brey Foster

•  David C. Doyle

•  Ann Brammer

•  Victor C. McKay

•  Steve Chandler

•  Rick Lawrence

•  David Cartmell

•  John T. Meng

•  Tommy Marshall, Jr.

•  LaRon Washington

•  David Irwin

•  Kirby Bennett

Voters in Mason County can expect a lively primary season, especially in crowded races like County Judge/Executive and the City Commission. Stay tuned for campaign updates as these candidates hit the trail!

For more details on candidate filings, voting, including absentee options and polling locations, visit the Mason County Clerk’s website: (Here).

The announcement surfaced on the local Facebook group “Eat Up Maysville”, In the emotional post a concerned citizen shared:

“Yes Maysville Fazolis has closed its doors with not any notice I’ve read comments regardless on how you feel or felt about the we employees were left without a job no warning ppl have kids to take care of and bills to pay nobody is talking about that tho instead they wanna criticize you I pray for you and my work family because I severe a God so big that I know he has a plan for me because when one door closes there is another one open”

The facebook users words underscore the sudden nature of the closure, with no prior warning to staff. Many employees now face uncertainty, especially those supporting families amid rising living costs.

No official reason for the closure has been provided by Fazoli’s corporate parent, FAT Brands. However, the chain’s Maysville page now lists all days as closed, and directories like MapQuest mark it as permanently shuttered.

This closure comes amid broader challenges for FAT Brands, which has faced significant financial pressures, including recent demands for immediate repayment of substantial debt. While not directly linked in statements, such corporate strains have led to location shutdowns across various brands in the portfolio.

For now, the community rallies around those affected, with many hoping the former employees find new opportunities quickly in the local job market. The sudden loss underscores the vulnerabilities faced by workers in the restaurant industry, especially in smaller towns.

The filing took place at the Mason County Clerk’s Office, where Boone, was accompanied by his wife for the occasion. A photo shared by the Mason County Clerk’s Office on social media captured the moment outside the office building, highlighting the formal step toward his candidacy.

Boone, a current member of the Maysville Board of Commissioners, brings extensive experience in non-profit management, workforce development, and community leadership. He holds advanced degrees, including a Doctorate in Education from the University of Kentucky, and has previously served in roles focused on economic development and tourism in the region.

Incumbent Mayor Debra L. Cotterill, who was appointed in 2021 to fill an unexpired term and later re-elected in 2022, has emphasized community initiatives during her tenure. The 2026 race will pit Boone’s vision for the city against Cotterill’s ongoing leadership.

Local elections in Maysville are non-partisan, with the mayoral term typically lasting four years. Filing marks the beginning of the campaign season, and voters can expect more details on platforms and debates in the coming months.

For more information on candidate filings or the election process, contact the Mason County Clerk’s Office.

The project, backed by an undisclosed Fortune 100 technology company, could bring over $1 billion in investment to the area along the Ohio River. Discussions began in late 2024, with land acquisition efforts targeting around 2,000 to 5,000 acres of farmland, primarily near Big Pond Pike outside Maysville.

Project Details and Potential Scale

The proposed campus would support AI and cloud computing operations, requiring up to 2.2 gigawatts of power—nearly doubling the capacity of the local East Kentucky Power Cooperative—and significant water usage, primarily drawn from the Ohio River.

Tyler McHugh, Economic Development Director for the Maysville-Mason County Industrial Development Authority, has described it as a “once-in-a-generation opportunity.” The facility could feature multiple large buildings, similar to other hyperscale campuses.

Economic Promises

Supporters, including McHugh and Mason County Judge-Executive Owen McNeill, highlight substantial benefits:

•  Approximately 1,000–1,500 temporary construction jobs.

•  Around 400 permanent positions, many with salaries averaging $80,000 or more, potentially reaching six figures.

•  Massive property tax revenue to fund schools, fire services, and infrastructure upgrades.

•  Potential to reverse decades of population decline and attract further development.

McHugh has emphasized the company’s commitment to being a “good neighbor,” with assurances on noise mitigation and infrastructure costs.

Community Opposition and Concerns

Heavy use of non-disclosure agreements has fueled frustration over transparency. Landowners have been offered premiums like $35,000 per acre, with some families reportedly turning down multimillion-dollar deals to preserve generational farms.

Farmer Tim Grosser and his family, for instance, have refused offers approaching $8 million, prioritizing their agricultural legacy.

Opposition has coalesced around the grassroots group “We Are Mason County,” led by figures like Max Moran. The group has organized petitions, social media campaigns, and attendance at public meetings, gathering hundreds of signatures against the project.

Residents at hearings and gatherings have voiced worries about:

•  Constant noise from cooling fans.

•  Strain on power grids, potentially raising electricity costs.

•  Water usage and pollution risks.

•  Loss of prime farmland and rural quality of life.

•  Health impacts and lack of renewable energy components.

Critics point to experiences in data center hotspots like Northern Virginia, where similar issues have arisen.

Current Status and Process

As of late December 2025, the project remains in the planning stages. The Maysville-Mason County Joint Planning Commission held multi-day public hearings in early December on proposed zoning text amendments to allow data centers.

No final approvals have been granted, and land acquisition relies on voluntary sales. Officials hope for potential finalization by mid-2026, but resistance from holdout landowners could complicate progress.

A Community at a Crossroads

The Mason County proposal reflects a broader national boom in data centers driven by AI demand. While economic incentives are tempting for a rural area facing decline, many residents insist the costs to their way of life are too high.

As one opponent put it: “No data center—not here, not now, never.” The coming months will determine whether Maysville embraces this technological future or preserves its agricultural past.

Known for his viral hits like “Because I Got High” and his distinctive persona, Afroman (real name Joseph Edgar Foreman) was seen in the stands, enjoying the action and interacting with community members.  His presence added an unexpected celebrity flair to what was already a lively evening of hoops.

Onlookers at the event uploaded photos online with the Artist!

Mason County isn’t usually a hotspot for national entertainment figures, making Afroman’s attendance all the more noteworthy. While the game itself was a regular part of the local Middle School Tournament Circuit, his cameo gave it a moment of broader relevance — especially on social media, where photos and short clips began circulating soon after.

All in all, Afroman’s presence at the Mason County tournament was a fun, unexpected moment that brought a bit of star power to local sports — and left plenty of room for speculation about what he might do next in the area.

The county, known for its newly deep red conservative roots, has slowly begun losing its redness—a shift that many say was on full display at the rally. The size and diversity of the crowd reflected a growing appetite for change, as more residents explore perspectives beyond the area’s traditional political lean.

The rally was organized by the Tri-County Democratic Women’s Club, a group that has rapidly grown in visibility and influence through its commitment to voter outreach, community education, and advocacy. Their efforts to host a large-scale event in an easily accessible public space paid off—cars lined the edges of the lot, attendees filled the open area, and the atmosphere buzzed with energy.

Speakers energized the crowd with messages focused on transparency, fairness, and pushing back against any form of political overreach. Many attendees expressed hope that this level of engagement signals a new era of civic involvement, especially in a county where political participation has traditionally leaned one way.

The successful event underscored a growing momentum among local residents eager to take part in shaping the political landscape—proving that in this community, no single person holds the crown, and more voices than ever are ready to be heard.

Interested in their cause? Join them on social media for more information and events: Here

Hazelett, a well-known public servant in Paintsville recognized for his community-focused leadership, said Foster Holds the “strength, resilience, and creativity to move Maysville and Mason County forward!”

“I look forward to seeing her win on November 3rd, 2026, garnering the opportunity to serve alongside her to bring new leadership, ideals, and opportunities to our rural communities we know and love!” Hazelett said in a statement.

Foster, who has centered her campaign on transparency, accountability, and stronger communication between elected officials and residents, said she is honored to receive Hazelett’s support.

“Councilman Hazelett understands what it means to serve with integrity,” Foster said in a message. “Having the backing of someone who has built such a respected reputation in Paintsville means a great deal to me and to the direction of this campaign.”

The endorsement adds to a growing list of regional voices rallying behind Foster as she prepares for the 2026 election. Foster has positioned her campaign as a movement toward more responsive leadership in Maysville, emphasizing community involvement, economic opportunity, and accessible local government.

Her campaign continues to host announcements, events, and updates on her official political pages as the race begins to take shape..